By not developing a widely accepted definition and a central organizing pri
nciple or paradigm, the field of public relations has left itself vulnerabl
e (1) to other fields that are making inroads into public relations' tradit
ional domain, and (2) to critics who are filling in their own definitions o
f public relations. While opportunities abound, public relations is unlikel
y to fulfill its promise until it is willing and able to identify its funda
mental nature and scope. This article proposes a definition ("managing stra
tegic relationships"), along with a three-dimensional framework, with which
to compare competing philosophies of public relations and from which to bu
ild a paradigm for the field.
Dr. Tames G. Hutton teaches marketing and public relations at Fairleigh Dic
kinson University in northern New Jersey, just outside New York City.