Glenohumeral relationships during physiologic shoulder motion and stress testing: Initial experience with open MR imaging and active imaging-plane registration

Citation
Cf. Beaulieu et al., Glenohumeral relationships during physiologic shoulder motion and stress testing: Initial experience with open MR imaging and active imaging-plane registration, RADIOLOGY, 212(3), 1999, pp. 699-705
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
RADIOLOGY
ISSN journal
00338419 → ACNP
Volume
212
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
699 - 705
Database
ISI
SICI code
0033-8419(199909)212:3<699:GRDPSM>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
PURPOSE: To test the hypotheses that open dynamic magnetic resonance (MR) i maging can (a) be used to evaluate and define normal shoulder motion in act ive joint motion and muscle contraction and (b) be used in conjunction with physical examination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With an open-configuration, 0.5-T MR imaging system and active image-plane tracking, 10 shoulders were studied in five asymptom atic subjects to establish normal patterns of glenohumeral:motion during ab duction and adduction and internal and external rotation. Preliminary studi es of physical examination during MR imaging, in which a physician examiner applied mechanical force to the humeral head, were also performed. RESULTS: During abduction and adduction and internal and external rotation maneuvers with active subject muscle contraction, the humeral head remained precisely centered on the glenoid fossa in all asymptomatic subjects, whic h is in agreement with findings of previous radiographic studies. Applicati on of force to the humeral head by an examiner was associated with as much as 6 mm of anterior translation and 13 mm of posterior translation. CONCLUSION: Dynamic MR imaging of the glenohumeral joint is possible over a wide range of physiologic motion in vertically open systems. Use of an MR tracking coil enabled accurate tracking of the anatomy of interest. These p reliminary measurements of normal glenohumeral motion patterns begin to est ablish normal ranges of motion and constitute a necessary first step in cha racterizing pathologic motion in patients with common clinical problems suc h as instability and impingement.