Objective. The impact of student course ratings on retention has not been e
xamined in previous research. This study begins to fill that gap. Methods.
Using data on American University undergraduates and on the ratings of the
courses in which they were enrolled, the study employs logistic regression
to estimate the impact of the ratings, averaged over the classes, on retent
ion, holding constant race, gender, GPA, receipt of aid, and other factors.
Results. Compared to mid-rated courses, enrollment in consistently poorly
rated classes significantly reduces the probability of retention. Unexpecte
dly, enrollment in consistently top-rated courses also significantly reduce
s the probability of retention. Conclusions. As expected, poorly rated cour
ses signify customer dissatisfaction. However, students enrolled in the bes
t-rated courses at AU appear equally dissatisfied. One explanation is that
satisfaction is short-lived; students may get used to top-rated courses, an
d soon look elsewhere for better courses.