Is laparoscopic antireflux surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease in the elderly safe and effective?

Citation
Lm. Brunt et al., Is laparoscopic antireflux surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease in the elderly safe and effective?, SURG ENDOSC, 13(9), 1999, pp. 838-842
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
ISSN journal
09302794 → ACNP
Volume
13
Issue
9
Year of publication
1999
Pages
838 - 842
Database
ISI
SICI code
0930-2794(199909)13:9<838:ILASFG>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
Background: The elderly have prevalence rates and clinical features of gast roesophageal reflux disease (GERD) similar to those in younger individuals, but the role of laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS) in the elderly has not been clearly established. The purpose of this study was to determine if the results of LARS in the elderly are comparable with those in younger pa tients. Methods: All patients undergoing LARS for GERD at the Washington University Medical Center were entered prospectively into a computerized database. Be tween May 1992 and June 1998, 339 patients underwent LARS and were divided into two groups based on age: nonelderly (ages, 18-64 years; n = 303) and e lderly (age, greater than or equal to 65 years; n = 36). Data were expresse d as mean +/- standard deviation (SD) and statistical analysis was performe d. Results: Elderly patients had a higher American Society of Anesthesiology ( ASA) score (2.3 +/- 1.5) and a longer hospital stay (2.1 +/- 0.2 days) than the younger group (ASA, 1.9 +/- 0.5; hospital stay, 1.6 +/- 0.9 days; p < 0.001). Operation times averaged 154 +/- 68 min in the elderly compared wit h 134 +/- 49 min in the nonelderly (p = NS). Grade I complications occurred significantly mon frequently in the elderly (13.9%) than in the nonelderly (2.6%), but the incidence of grade II complications was similar between th e groups (elderly 2.8% vs nonelderly 2.7%). There were no grade III complic ations in either group, but there was one death in the nonelderly group. At follow-up ranging to 81 months (median, 27 months), the two groups had sim ilar low incidences of heartburn and dysphagia. Anatomic failures of LARS d eveloped in 19 nonelderly patients (6.2%) compared with 2 elderly patients (5.5%; p = NS). Conclusions: As shown in this study, LARS is safe and effective in elderly patients with GERD. Age older than 65 years should not be a contraindicatio n to laparoscopic antireflux surgery in properly selected patients.