The methods used currently for enumeration of mucosal stages of cyathostome
s include transmural illumination (TMI) and peptic digestion (DIG). Enumera
ting the inhibited early L3 (EL3) and differentiating between mucosal devel
oping L3 (DL3) and L4 (ML4) is only possible when DIG is used, However, in
some studies higher numbers of DL (DL3 + ML4) have been found when using TM
I as opposed to BIG. This finding, however, is not consistent. Moreover, re
sults are not consistent when DIG and TMT are compared for treated and cont
rol groups of horses in drug trials. Studies performed on the effect of fre
ezing on DIG and TMI also show inconsistent results between laboratories. H
owever, there is, evidence that digested samples can be preserved in 5-10%
formalin or in 70% ethanol when used as a buffered isotonic solution. Based
on these results it is premature to recommend standardized mucosal larval
recovery techniques. Consequently, TMI and DIG should both be applied. Reco
mmendations for further research for the development of standardized techni
ques are given. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.