IN-VITRO AND IN-VIVO ANTITUMOR-ACTIVITY OF IMMUNOCONJUGATES PREPARED BY LINKING 5-FLUOROURIDINE TO ANTIADENOCARCINOMA MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY

Citation
P. Brusa et al., IN-VITRO AND IN-VIVO ANTITUMOR-ACTIVITY OF IMMUNOCONJUGATES PREPARED BY LINKING 5-FLUOROURIDINE TO ANTIADENOCARCINOMA MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY, Il Farmaco, 52(2), 1997, pp. 71-81
Citations number
52
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Pharmacy
Journal title
ISSN journal
0014827X
Volume
52
Issue
2
Year of publication
1997
Pages
71 - 81
Database
ISI
SICI code
0014-827X(1997)52:2<71:IAIAOI>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
5-Fluorouridine (5-FUr), a cytotoxic antitumoral agent not in clinical use because of its systemic toxicity, and AR-3, a monoclonal antibody specific to a human colorectal adenocarcinoma, were covalently linked via two different strategies. 5-FUr was 5' succinilated after protect ion of the secondary hydroxyl groups and the carboxylate derivative wa s then activated as N-hydroxysuccinimidyl ester in order to react with the amino groups present in the monoclonal antibody, giving an amide linkage. Alternatively, a 5-FUr immunoconjugate containing an acid-cle avable hydrazone bond was formed from the reaction between an acyl hyd razide derivative of 5-FUr and a periodate oxydized antibody with appr oximately 12 aldehyde groups in its carbohydrate region. An average of 9 to 12 drug molecules were attached to the antibody. In a cytotoxic assay on the human colorectal carcinoma cell line HT-29, the hydrazone containing drug conjugate was equally active as the succinylamido con jugate and the free drug. However, ELISA showed that while in the case of the succinylamido conjugate the Mab immunoreactivity was not affec ted after conjugation, there was a significant loss of reactivity in t he acid cleavable conjugate. In a model of a disseminated intraabdomin al carcinomatosis by HT-29 intraperitoneal graft in nude mice, the 5-F Ur immunoconjugate selected was more effective than the unconjugated d rug in medium-term therapy (21 days after the graft and 16 days after drug treatment), albeit in the longer period the efficacy of the two f ormulations was similar. The toxic effect of the drug-conjugate in viv o was much weaker, demonstrating its clear advantage over the drug, in terms of pharmacological efficacy.