E. Benfeldt et al., Microdialysis vs. suction blister technique for in vivo sampling of pharmacokinetics in the human dermis, ACT DER-VEN, 79(5), 1999, pp. 338-342
Our aim was to simultaneously investigate 2 techniques for bl vivo sampling
of peripheral compartment pharmacokinetics after systemic administration o
f acetylsalicylic acid. Ten volunteers were given 2 g acetylsalicylic acid
orally. Blood samples and dialysates from 4 microdialysis probes inserted i
n the dermis of the forearm were collected for 5 h and suction blisters wer
e raised 1-3 h after dosing. In microdialysates, both acetylsalicylic acid
and the metabolite salicylic acid mere measurable in the absence of hydroly
sing enzymes, The mean C-max (maximum concentration) of total, unbound sali
cylic acid was 9.5 mu g/ml in microdialysates, 13.2 mu g/ml in suction blis
ter fluid and 56.5 mu g/ml in plasma. Mean T-max (time to C-max) for salicy
lic acid was 188 and 161 min in plasma and microdialysates, respectively. T
he dermis-to-plasma C-max ratio was 0.16 +/- 0.04 (mean +/- SD) by microdia
lysis sampling and 0.25 +/- 0.09 by the suction blister fluid method. Close
correlations (p < 0.01) were found between C-max of salicylic acid in micr
odialysates and plasma, and between C-max of salicylic acid in suction blis
ter fluid and plasma, The 2 techniques were in excellent accordance with ev
en closer correlation between maximum concentrations obtained by microdialy
sis and suction blister fluid sampling (p < 0.001). However, comparing the
tolerability of the sampling procedure, ease of analysis, and detail in chr
onology, microdialysis is superior for sampling in vivo pharmacokinetics in
the dermis.