These experiments were designed to test the hypothesis that the contrasting
patterns of macronutrient selection described previously in AKR/J (fat pre
ference) and SWR/J (carbohydrate preference) mice are not dependent on a si
ngle diet paradigm. The effect of mouse strain on proportional fat intake w
as tested in naive mice by presenting two-choice diets possessing a variety
of physical, sensory, and nutritive properties. In three separate experime
nts, AKR/J mice preferentially selected and consumed a higher proportion of
energy from the high-fat diet than SWR/J mice. Specifically, this phenotyp
ic difference was observed with 1) fat-protein vs. carbohydrate-protein die
ts, independent of fat type (vegetable shortening or lard), 2) isocaloric,
high- vs. low-fat liquid diet preparations, and 3) high- vs. low-fat powder
ed-granular diets. These results confirm our previous observation of a high
er proportional fat intake by AKR/J compared with SWR/J mice using the thre
e-choice macronutrient selection diet and show that this strain difference
generalizes across several diet paradigms. This strain difference is due la
rgely to the robust and reliable fat preference of the AKR/J mice. In contr
ast, macronutrient preference in SWR/J mice varied across paradigms, sugges
ting a differential response by this strain to some orosensory or postinges
tive factor(s).