BACKGROUND: The study prospectively assesses deadspace [(arterial CO2 - end
-tidal CO2)/arterial CO2] and the D-dimer assay as a rapid, noninvasive alt
ernative for evaluating pulmonary embolism in critically ill patients.
METHODS: Group I patients had nonemergency baseline arterial blood gas and
end-tidal CO2 recorded. If patients experienced respiratory distress, D-dim
er with repeat arterial blood gas and end-tidal CO2 were obtained. Patients
emergently intubated without baseline laboratory studies (group II) had ar
teria( blood gas, end-tidal CO2, and D-dimer obtained.
RESULTS: A significant increase (P <0.001) in deadspace was noted with pulm
onary embolism (0.43 [0.08], range 0.30 to 0.51, n = 7) versus without (0.2
1 [0.15], range 0.00 to 0.43, n = 14). Patients in group 1 with pulmonary e
mbolism demonstrated increased deadspace (P <0.026, 0.28 [0.01] to 0.39 [0.
13], n = 2) from baseline compared with decreased deadspace (P <0.001, 0.20
[0.09] to 15 [0.16], n = 9) without pulmonary embolism. D-dimer levels >1,
000 ng/mL were present in all patients with pulmonary embolism.
CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates the ability of deadspace and D-dimer to
exclude and potentially diagnose pulmonary embolism. Am J Surg. 1999;178:9
8-102. (C) 1999 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.