Trends in quality of anesthesia care associated with changing staffing patterns, productivity, and concurrency of case supervision in a teaching hospital
Kl. Posner et Pr. Freund, Trends in quality of anesthesia care associated with changing staffing patterns, productivity, and concurrency of case supervision in a teaching hospital, ANESTHESIOL, 91(3), 1999, pp. 839-847
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Background. The authors used continuous quality improvement (CQI) program d
ata to investigate trends in quality of anesthesia care associated with cha
nging staffing patterns in a university hospital.
Methods: The monthly proportion of cases performed by solo attending anesth
esiologists versus attending-resident teams or attending-certified register
ed nurse anesthetist (CRNA) teams was used to measure staffing patterns. An
esthesia team productivity was measured as mean monthly surgical anesthesia
hours billed per attending anesthesiologist per clinical day, Supervisory
ratios (concurrency) were measured as mean monthly number of cases supervis
ed concurrently by attending anesthesiologists. Quality of anesthesia care
was measured as monthly rates of critical incidents, patient injury, escala
tion of care, operational inefficiencies, and human errors per 10,000 cases
. Trends in quality at increasing productivity and concurrency levels from
1992 to 1997 were analyzed by the one-sided Jonckheere-Terpstra test.
Results: Productivity was positively correlated with concurrency (r = 0.838
; P < 0.001). Productivity levels ranged from 10 to 17 h per anesthesiologi
st per clinical day. Concurrency ranged from 1.6 to 2.2 cases per attending
anesthesiologist. At higher productivity and concurrency levels, solo anes
thesiologists conducted a smaller percentage of cases, and the proportion o
f cases with CRNA team members increased. The patient injury rate decreased
with increased productivity levels (P = 0.002), whereas the criticalincide
nt rate increased (P = 0.001). Changes in operational inefficiency, escalat
ion of care, and human error rates were not statistically significant (P =
0.072, 0.345, 0.320, respectively).
Conclusions: Most aspects of quality of anesthesia care were apparently not
effected by changing anesthesia team composition or increased productivity
and concurrency. Only team performance wits measured; the role of individu
als (attending anesthesiologist, resident, or CRNA) in quality of care was
not directly measured. Further research is needed to explain lower patient
injury rates and increases in critical incident reporting at higher concurr
ency and productivity levels.