Tj. Dewitt et al., Trait compensation and cospecialization in a freshwater snail: size, shapeand antipredator behaviour, ANIM BEHAV, 58, 1999, pp. 397-407
We examined relationships between individual differences in antipredator be
haviour and prey morphological characters (size, shape) that influence prey
vulnerability. Behavioural responses of Physa gyrina to chemical cues asso
ciated with predation by crayfish Orconectes rusticus, were assayed in the
laboratory for 6 days over a 13-day period. Snails displayed consistent, in
dividually repeatable responses to the predation cues, including hiding (re
fuge use) and substratum avoidance (crawling to the water surface or out of
the water). We assessed shell morphology using morphometric techniques tha
t isolate geometrically independent components of size and shape variation
corresponding to aperture width and apertural obstruction. Previous studies
indicate that large size, narrow apertures and obstructed apertures reduce
morphological vulnerability to the shell-entry predation tactics used by c
rayfish. In the present study, small, and thus more vulnerable, prey tended
to show stronger antipredator behaviour than large prey (i.e. behavioural
compensation for morphological vulnerability). In contrast, behavioural and
shape-based defences were positively correlated; snails with narrow apertu
res showed strong antipredator responses. We refer to this 'double defence'
against predators as cospecialization. With either compensation or cospeci
alization, suites of correlated behavioural or morphological traits must be
studied in tandem to understand the adaptive value of prey responses to pr
edators. (C) 1999 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.