Effects of hear load and of photoperiod on lactation performance were evalu
ated using milk test data of three Israeli Holstein herds over a period of
3 years, from 1994 to 1996. All together 2209 cows, with 28029 milk records
, were included. Photoperiod effects were examined as associated with day l
ength and daily changes in day length and heat load index was formulated as
a function of the seasonal day and night ambient temperatures, to account
for the heat load effect. The regression model included effects of cow, her
d, year, lactation number and days in milk in addition to the seasonal effe
cts. The dependent variables were milk yield and fat, protein and lactose c
oncentrations. Milk yield was affected by both photoperiod and hear load, w
ith the peak photoperiod effect in May and amplitude of 3.1 (s.d. 0.91 kg/d
ay and negative heat load effect of -1.8 (s.d. 0.4) kg/day at its peak. Pro
tein concentration was affected by photoperiod, with the peak effect in Jan
uary (amplitude of 1.7 (s.e. 0.51 g/kg) but not by heat load (-0.2 (s.d. 0.
6) g/kg). Far concentration was affected primarily by heat load (-3.4 (s.d.
0.7),g/kg), with a photoperiod effect which peaked in October (amplitude o
f 1.8 (s.d. 0.8) g/kg). Lactose concentration was affected by both environm
ental factors to a lesser extent (photoperiod amplitude of 0.6 (s.d. 0.2) g
/kg and heat load effect of -0.03 (s.d. 0.16) g/kg). Comparison of the pred
icted seasonal effects on milk yield and composition with the annual punctu
ation in the national herd showed a good match of the predicted effects wit
h the national observations. It is concluded that while heat load relief ma
y be beneficial, manipulation of the photoperiod may induce adverse effects
on milk yield and composition.