Ionospheric measurements during the CRISTA/MAHRSI campaign: their implications and comparison with previous campaigns

Citation
J. Lastovicka et al., Ionospheric measurements during the CRISTA/MAHRSI campaign: their implications and comparison with previous campaigns, ANN GEOPH, 17(8), 1999, pp. 1040-1052
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Space Sciences
Journal title
ANNALES GEOPHYSICAE-ATMOSPHERES HYDROSPHERES AND SPACE SCIENCES
ISSN journal
09927689 → ACNP
Volume
17
Issue
8
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1040 - 1052
Database
ISI
SICI code
0992-7689(199908)17:8<1040:IMDTCC>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
The CRISTA/MAHRSI experiment on board a space shuttle was accompanied by a broad campaign of rocket, balloon and ground-based measurements. Supporting lower ionospheric ground-based measurements were run in Europe and Eastern Asia between 1 October-30 November, 1994. Results of comparisons with long ionospheric data series together with short-term comparisons inside the in terval October-November, 1994, showed that the upper middle atmosphere (h = 80-100 km) at middle latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere in the interval of the CRISTA/MAHRSI experiment (4-12 November, 1994) was very close to its expected climatological state. In other words, the average results of the experiment can be used as climatological data, at least for the given area/ altitudes. The role of solar/geomagnetic and "meteorological" control of th e lower ionosphere is investigated and compared with the results of MAP/WIN E, MAC/SINE and DYANA campaigns. The effects of both solar/geomagnetic and global meteorological factors on the lower ionosphere are found to be weak during autumn 1994 compared to those in MAP/WINE and DYANA winters, and the y are even slightly weaker than those in MAP/SINE summer. The comparison of the four campaigns suggests the following overall pattern in winter the le vier ionosphere at northern middle latitudes appears to be fairly well "met eorologically'' controlled with a very weak solar influence. In summer, sol ar influence is somewhat stronger and dominates the weak "meteorological" i nfluence, but the overall solar/meteorological control is weaker than in wi nter. In autumn we find the weakest overall solar/meteorological control, l ocal effects evidently dominate.