Study objective: To examine the effect of an emergency department program o
n acute asthma care.
Methods: We conducted a before-after study of an acute asthma quality impro
vement initiative in an urban teaching hospital with 65,000 annual ED visit
s. in mid-1994, a multidisciplinary group identified deficiencies in acute
asthma care, developed and implemented a local Version of the National Asth
ma Education Program's practice guidelines (including a standard asthma ord
er sheet), and provided new peak flow (PF) meters. The "before" group compr
ised ail adults with acute asthma seen during January 1994 (n=51); "after"
groups comprised all adults with acute asthma seen during October 1994, Feb
ruary 1995, and June 1995 (n=145). Data were compared across months using a
nonparametric test for trend.
Results: Although patient demographic characteristics and asthma severity w
ere similar across months, ED process of care significantly changed. Initia
l PF measurements were obtained in 20% of patients before intervention, com
pared with 82%, 84%, and 83% during the postintervention months (P for tren
d <.001). Follow-up PF readings were obtained in 22%, 70%, 78%, and 62% (P<
.001). Median delays to beta-agonist and steroid therapy decreased by appro
ximately 16 minutes (P<.001) and 34 minutes (P=.04), respectively. Outcomes
improved, with median ED length of stay decreasing by 58 minutes (P=.01),
and fewer inpatient admissions (P=.05); there was no significant change in
4-week relapse to our hospital.
Conclusion: A guideline-based ED asthma program changed clinical practice a
nd improved acute asthma care in a sustained fashion. The effect of this in
tervention on cost and other outcomes is uncertain.