We have previously shown that whereas (RS)-2-amino-3-(3-hydroxy-5-phen
ylisoxazol-4-yl) propionic acid (APPA) shows the characteristics of a
partial agonist at (RS)-2-amino-3-(3-hydroxy-5-methyrisoxazol-4-yl) pr
opionic acid (AMPA) receptors, (S)-APPA is a full AMPA receptor agonis
t and (R)-APPA a weak competitive AMPA receptor antagonist. This obser
vation led us to introduce the new pharmacological concept, functional
partial agonism. Recently we have shown that the 2-pyridyl analogue o
f APPA, (RS)-2-amino-3-[3-hydroxy-5-(2-pyridyl) isoxazol-4-yl] propion
ic acid (2-Py-AMPA), is a potent and apparently full AMPA receptor ago
nist, and this compound has now been resolved into (+)- and (-)-2-Py-A
MPA (ee greater than or equal to 99.0%) by chiral HPLC using a Chirobi
otic T column. The absolute stereochemistry of the enantiomers of APPA
has previously been established by X-ray analysis, and on the basis o
f comparative studies of the circular dichroism spectra of the enantio
mers of APPA and 2-Py-AMPA, (+)- and (-)-2-Py-AMPA were assigned the (
S)- and (R)-configuration, respectively. In a series of receptor bindi
ng studies, neither enantiomer of 2-Py-AMPA showed detectable affinity
for kainic acid receptor sites or different sites at the N-methyl-D-a
spartic acid (NMDA receptor complex. (+)-(S)-2-Py-AMPA was an effectiv
e inhibitor of [H-3]AMPA binding (IC50 = 0.19 +/- 0.06 mu M) and a pot
ent AMPA receptor agonist in the rat cortical wedge preparation (EC50
= 4.5 +/- 0.3 mu M) comparable With AMPA (IC50 = 0.040 +/- 0.01 mu M;
EC50 = 3.5 +/- 0.2 mu M), but much more potent than (+)-(S)-APPA (IC50
= 5.5 +/- 2.2 mu M) EC50 = 230 +/- 12 mu M). Like (-)-(R)-APPA (IC50
> 100 mu M), (-)-(R)-2-Py-AMPA (IC50 > 100 mu M) did not significantly
affect [H-3]AMPA binding, and both compounds were weak AMPA receptor
antagonists;(K-i = 270 +/- 50 and 290 +/- 20 mu M, respectively). Chir
ality 9:274-280, 1997. (C) 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.