Differentiated effects on splanchnic homeostasis by selective and non-selective endothelin receptor antagonism in porcine endotoxaemia

Citation
A. Oldner et al., Differentiated effects on splanchnic homeostasis by selective and non-selective endothelin receptor antagonism in porcine endotoxaemia, BR J PHARM, 127(8), 1999, pp. 1793-1804
Citations number
61
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
ISSN journal
00071188 → ACNP
Volume
127
Issue
8
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1793 - 1804
Database
ISI
SICI code
0007-1188(199908)127:8<1793:DEOSHB>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
1 The non-selective endothelin (ET) receptor antagonist bosentan has been s hown to restore systemic and gut oxygen delivery and reverse intestinal muc osal acidosis in porcine endotoxin shock. 2 To further elucidate the specific role of the ETA as opposed to the ETB r eceptor and their effects in the splanchnic region a non-selective (ET(MIX) ra) A-182086 and selective ETA (ET(A)ra) PD155080 and ETB (ET(B)ra) A-19262 1 receptor antagonists were administered, separately or simultaneously (ET( A - B)ra) 2 h after onset of endotoxin shock. These four groups were compar ed to a control group receiving only endotoxin and vehicle. 3 Thirty-nine pigs were anaesthetized and catheterized for measurement of c entral and regional haemodynamics. A tonometer in the distal ileum was used for measurement of mucosal PCO2. Blood gases and plasma ET-1-LI levels as well as histological samples from the gut were assessed. Intervention was s tarted 2 h after onset of endotoxemia and the experiments were terminated a fter 5 h. 4 Endotoxin-induced changes in systemic, gut oxygen delivery and portal hep atic vascular resistance and systemic acidosis were effectively counteracte d by both ET(A + B)ra and ET(MIX)ra. ET(A)ra administration was not effecti ve while ET(B)ra proved to be fatal as all animals in this group died prior to full time of the experiment. While both ET(A - B)ra and ET(MIX)ra impro ved gut oxygen delivery only the latter attenuated the profound endotoxin-i nduced ileal mucosal acidosis. 5 The lethal effect seen from selective ETB receptor antagonism in the curr ent study may be due to increased ETA receptor activity as plasma levels of ET-1 is increased several fold by blocking the ETB receptor and thereby th e plasma-ET-1-clearing function. Furthermore, a loss of endothelial ETB rec eptor vasodilating properties may also have contributed to the lethal cours e in the ET(B)ra group 6 The findings in this study suggest that ET is involved in the profound en dotoxin-induced disturbances in splanchnic homeostasis in porcine endotoxae mia. Furthermore, antagonism of both ETA and ETB receptors is necessary to effectively counteract these changes.