Background Authors have suggested that the high rate of schizophrenia repor
ted for African - Caribbeans living in the UK is due to misdiagnosis by Bri
tish psychiatrists.
Aims To compare the diagnoses made by a Black Jamaican psychiatrist with th
ose of White British psychiatrists.
Method All in-patients on four wards at the Maudsley hospital were approach
ed for the study; 66 participated: 24 White, 29 Black African - Caribbeans
and 13 Blacks from other countries of origin. F.W.H., a Black Jamaican psyc
hiatrist, conducted his standard clinical assessment and performed the Pres
ent State Examination (PSE) on these patients. His diagnoses were compared
with the case note diagnoses made by British psychiatrists, and with the PS
E CATEGO diagnoses.
Results Of 29 African and African Caribbean patients diagnosed with schizop
hrenia, the diagnoses of the British and the Jamaican psychiatrists agreed
in 16 instances (55%) and disagreed in 13 (45%). Hence, interrater reliabil
ity was poor (kappa=0.45). PSE CATEGO diagnosed a higher proportion of subj
ects as having schizophrenia than the Jamaican psychiatrist did (chi(2)=3.7
4, P=0.052).
Conclusions Agreement between the Jamaican psychiatrist and his UK counterp
arts about which patients had schizophrenia was poor. PSE CATEGO may overes
timate rates of schizophrenia.
Declaration of interest F.W.H. received financial support from the Rhodes T
rust and the Stanley Foundation.