Wh. Dittrich et L. Henderson, Preparing to react in the absence of uncertainty: II. Stimulus uncertaintyand response compatibility in tactile reaction time, BR J PSYCHO, 90, 1999, pp. 349-372
Stimulus uncertainty and stimulus response compatibility were manipulated i
n three reaction time (RT) experiments. Key-release responses were summoned
either by direct tactile or visual cuing of the response finger or by obli
que cuing of the contralateral finger. Comparisons of standard simple react
ion time (SRT) with 2:1 convergent RT (CoRT), in which participants were re
quired to execute the same response to either of two stimuli, invariably re
vealed a stimulus uncertainty effect. Extended practice and high compatibil
ity diminished, but did not eliminate, this effect. The effect was not conf
ined to trials in which the stimulus differed from the previous one, trials
following an error, or to a longer tail on participants' CoRT distribution
. CoRT remained longer than SRT when tactile imperative stimuli were replac
ed by visual ones, establishing that the stimulus uncertainty effect was no
t a peculiarity of the bimanual tactile RT set-up. The latencies of CoRT we
re invariably shorter than for binary Go/No-Go RT pr standard choice RT (CR
T), indicating a role for factors other than stimulus uncertainty. A remark
able feature of the tactile paradigm was the varying impact of compatibilit
y on different tasks: for example, CRT was actually shorter than Go/No-Go R
T when participants responded with the finger stimulated but considerably l
onger when responding with the contralateral finger.