Fs. Toure et al., Comparative analysis of two diagnostic methods of human loaiosis: IgG4 serology and nested-PCR assay., B S PATH EX, 92(3), 1999, pp. 167-170
By evaluating the diagnostic methods developed in our laboratory the preval
ence of loaiosis was estimated among 201 individuals from the province of H
aut Ogooue in Gabon using IgG4 serology and nested-PCR. The study showed th
at the prevalence of loaiosis was higher than that described using standard
microscopy. IgG4-based ELISA (Enzyme Linked Immunosorbant Assay) using cru
de extract of Loa loa microfilariae showed that 80% (35/44) of microfilarae
mic individuals (MF') and 56% (88/157) of amicrofilaraemics (AMF) presented
antibodies. By contrast, L. loa specific DNA amplified by nested-PCR was d
etected in all MF and in 68% (106/157) of AMF: Among the 201 samples tested
, 95 (47%) gave positive results in both tests. These results indicate that
the presence of IgG4 antibodies directed against crude extract of L. loa m
icrofilariae is not linked to the positivity of nested-PCR assay (chi(2) fo
r paired data = 8.78, P < 0,02). We conclude that the PCR assay is more sen
sitive than the detection of IgG4 antibodies (directed against crude extrac
t of L. loa microfilariae) in detecting loaiosis, and particularly occult l
oaiosis (infection without circulating microfilariae).