Tsk. Mok et al., A multi-centre randomized phase II study of nolatrexed versus doxorubicin in treatment of Chinese patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, CANC CHEMOT, 44(4), 1999, pp. 307-311
Purpose: A multi-centre randomized phase II study of single agent nolatrexe
d dihydrochloride Versus doxorubicin was undertaken in Chinese patients wit
h advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to study and compare the clinical
efficacy of the two drugs. Methods: Fifty-four patients with clinical or h
istological diagnosis of HCC were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive nola
trexed or doxorubicin. Nolatrexed 725 mg/m(2)/day was given by continuous i
nfusion via a central venous device for 5 days and doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) w
as given as a rapid intravenous infusion every 3 weeks. Results: No objecti
ve responses were observed in either treatment arm. Two patients in the nol
atrexed arm and none in the doxorubicin arm had > 50% decline in serum alph
a-fetoprotein. The median survival for the patients in the nolatrexed and d
oxorubicin arms was 139 days and 104 days, respectively. Moderate toxicitie
s including leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, mucositis and skin rash were obse
rved in both treatment arms. Conclusion: Nolatrexed and doxorubicin are min
imally active in the treatment of advanced HCC. Given the small sample size
, no difference is observed between the two drugs.