Ultrasound echo-enhancers in the evaluation of endovascular prostheses

Citation
Mf. Giannoni et al., Ultrasound echo-enhancers in the evaluation of endovascular prostheses, CARDIOV SUR, 7(5), 1999, pp. 532-538
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
ISSN journal
09672109 → ACNP
Volume
7
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
532 - 538
Database
ISI
SICI code
0967-2109(199908)7:5<532:UEITEO>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
Whereas conventional vascular surgical procedures are routinely monitored b y ultrasound imaging, endovascular prostheses are usually monitored by radi ographical imaging techniques. The aim of this study was to determine the s afety, patient acceptance and role of ultrasound echo-enhancers (SHU 508 A) in the evaluation of endovascular devices. Nine patients were studied: six had stents (four in the internal carotid artery and two in the renal arter y) and three had endoluminal prostheses (one in the abdominal aorta. one in the subclavian and one in the iliac artery). Endovascular patency and corr ect placement were studied with contrast angiography and ultrasound examina tion with and without contrast enhancement Patients underwent angiography a t the end of the endovascular procedure. and ultrasound examinations on the first postoperative day, Ultrasound contrast media (SHU 508 A) was injecte d through an antecubital vein at a rate of 1 ml/s, A total of 13 injections were given in nine patients. Ultrasonograms were obtained with 7.5 and 3.5 MHz transducers (Acuson 128 XP) and recorded on videotape for off-line vis ual inspection, Baseline and echo-enhanced sequences were assessed by two i ndependent observers. None of the patients reported side-effects during or after the injection of the ultrasound echo-enhancer. Postoperative angiogra phy showed endovascular patency and correct placement in all patients. The baseline ultrasound examination confirmed endoprosthesis patency in seven o f nine patients: none revealed endoprosthesis malplacement. Contrast-enhanc ed ultrasound examination confirmed endoprosthesis patency, In two cases, t he echo-contrast examination revealed persisting flow within the aneurysmal sac: in another patient it showed the incomplete adhesion of the distal po rtion of the endoprosthesis to the arterial wall. The preliminary findings suggest that ultrasound echo-enhancers are safe to use and induce no side-e ffects. Echo-enhanced sequences often provide additional information on the technical success of endovascular procedures. They promise to be useful in follow-up studies for assessing the functioning of endoprostheses. (C) 199 9 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.