ROUTINE DIAGNOSIS OF LARGE GRANULAR LYMPHOCYTIC-LEUKEMIA BY SOUTHERN BLOT AND POLYMERASE CHAIN-REACTION ANALYSIS OF CLONAL T-CELL RECEPTOR GENE REARRANGEMENTS
Dk. Ryan et al., ROUTINE DIAGNOSIS OF LARGE GRANULAR LYMPHOCYTIC-LEUKEMIA BY SOUTHERN BLOT AND POLYMERASE CHAIN-REACTION ANALYSIS OF CLONAL T-CELL RECEPTOR GENE REARRANGEMENTS, Journal of clinical pathology-Molecular pathology, 50(2), 1997, pp. 77-81
Aims-To compare the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay with standar
d Southern blot (SE) hybridisation for the detection of clonal T cell
receptor (TCR) gene rearrangements in large granular lymphocyte (LGL)
proliferations; to evaluate the reliability and practicality of the me
thods for routine diagnostic use; and to determine the sensitivity of
the PCR method. Methods-Blood lymphocytes were isolated from 12 patien
ts with persistent CD3(+)CD8(+) lymphocytosis with LGL morphology. Clo
nal rearrangements of the TCR gene were demonstrated by SE hybridisati
on with a TCR beta constant probe, and by PCR amplification of portion
s of the TCR beta and TCR gamma genes. Results-Monoclonal TCR beta gen
e rearrangements were detected in eight patients (67%) by PCR analysis
and five patients (42%) by SE hybridisation. PCR analysis also showed
that seven patients (58%) had monoclonal TCR gamma gene rearrangement
s. All cases which had TCR beta clonal rearrangements shown by SE hybr
idisation were similarly identified by PCR. Sensitivity tests suggeste
d that the TCR beta PCR technique was capable of detecting clonality i
n as little as 50 pg of DNA. The TCR beta primers could detect one clo
nal cell in approximately 200 or more normal cells (< 0.5%), a sensiti
vity level that at least doubles that of the SE hybridisation techniqu
e. Conclusions-The use of PCR technology proved to be superior to SE h
ybridisation for the routine investigation of suspected cases of LGL l
eukaemia. Nine patients (75%) in this study were found to have TCR bet
a and/or TCR gamma monoclonal gene rearrangements. This approach is id
eal for distinguishing between reactive and clonal LGL proliferation i
n a routine diagnostic laboratory.