Ap. De Wet et al., Interpreting land-use history by integrating aerial photographs, near-surface geophysics, and field observations into a digital database, ENV ENG GEO, 5(2), 1999, pp. 235-254
Near-surface, non-invasive field geophysics was used to investigate the lan
d-use history of a 60-acre former industrial site in Lancaster, Pennsylvani
a. A proton-precession magnetometer and a Geonics EM31 non-contacting elect
romagnetic conductivity meter were used to measure eleven profiles across t
he site. Based on all the available data, four major land-use areas are dis
tinguished: building foundation areas, excavated areas (clay mining), landf
ills and background areas. The geophysical data show distinct signatures fo
r these land-use classifications, The conductivity readings can be characte
rized by their median values and standard deviations within each of these c
lassifications: a) sports fields (background), 7.5 +/-2.8 millisiemens per
meter (mS/m); b) excavated areas, 4.6 +/-3.4 mS/m; c) building foundations,
7.7 +/-4.0 mS/m; and d) landfill areas: 34.0 +/-30.8 mS/m, For magnetics,
the median (with background subtracted) and standard deviation within each
classifications are: 1) sports fields (background), -0.9 +/-8.7 nanoteslas
(nT); 2) excavated areas, -0.8 +/-10.8 nT; 3) building foundations, -96.2 /-291.0 nT; 4) landfill areas, 37.7 +/-473.9 nT. Both conductivity and magn
etics show similar patterns, although conductivity provides clearer visual
discrimination between land-use types. The in-phase conductivity data are c
onsistent with the land-use patterns determined from the aerial photographs
and the other geophysical data. Zero (negative) readings occur over areas
with high metal content such as the buildings foundations area and the land
fill area. Clay pit areas show uniformily low readings consistent with the
lack of metallic objects in these areas.
All the data, including historical aerial photographs, historical land-cove
r information, geophysical data, topography, hydrology, and existing buildi
ngs and infrastructure were integrated into a digital database. Data such a
s historical aerial photographs provided temporal (past) information about
the land-use history of the site, while the geophysical data provided curre
nt information about the type and spatial distribution of land use. The int
egration of the geophysical data with other data in a digital database is a
n effective tool for interpreting landuse history and understanding present
environmental conditions.