The results of spinal fusion in patients with paralytic deformities are usu
ally presented as the correction of the deformity. When evaluating the surg
ical results in such patients, it is advantageous to classify the patients
into subgroups because of the varying dysfunction and disabilities. The aim
of this study was to evaluate the effect of spinal fusion in patients with
paralytic scoliosis in relation to function in terms of Impairments, activ
ities in terms of Disabilities, and dependence in terms of Handicaps 1 year
postoperatively, with emphasis on subgroups. A total of 94 patients with p
aralytic scoliosis and 18 different diagnoses were evaluated 1 year after s
urgery. The patients were classified according to whether or not they could
understand verbal instructions. The patients were also grouped according t
o the Scoliosis Research Society classification of diagnoses. A set of inst
ruments was used with the variables classified according to WHO's Internati
onal Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps (ICIDH). Th
is consists of the patient's/relative's motives for surgery, persistent ski
n discoloration, ambulating or use of wheelchair, use of a brace, sitting b
alance, weight distribution on a sitting surface, angle of scoliosis, reach
ing, pain estimation, activities of daily living (ADL) Klein and Bell, care
given, time spent resting, and seating supports. The set of instrument als
o included a follow-up questionnaire comprising 12 different areas, where t
he patients/relatives assessed the results of surgery. The study showed tha
t spinal fusion in paralytic scoliosis led to showed improvements in the wh
ole group of patients at the Impariment level in the angle of scoliosis, si
tting balance, weight distribution, and reduced number of patients with per
sistent skin discoloration, and at the Handicap level in reduced time for r
esting during the day, reduced number of seating supports in the wheelchair
, and in the use of a brace. Most of the parameters were unchanged. The res
ults in the subgroups were almost the same as in the whole group, although
pain and reaching at the Impairment level, and ADL at the Disability level,
could not be measured in the patients who were unable to understand verbal
instructions. The subjectively assessed results showed that seating postur
e was ranked positively irrespective of the motive for surgery. The study s
howed that the patients with paralytic scoliosis maintained or improved the
ir function and level of independence in terms of Impairment and Handicap I
year postoperatively. The subjective results assessed by the patients/rela
tives also showed a positive outcome of surgery. Weight distribution on a s
eating surface was improved, bur still uneven, and with respect to better s
itting balance and increasing time sitting in a wheelchair, this can involv
e a risk for pressure sores and needs further investigation. When introduci
ng outcomes including the Disability level, one must take the importance of
homogeneity in the groups into consideration.