Bone mineral ''density'' (BMD) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptio
metry (DEXA) does not represent the volumetric density (grams per cubi
c centimeter), but rather the areal density (grams per square centimet
er), This distinction is important during growth, The purpose of this
study was to measure vertebral dimensions in cadavers of young pigtail
macaques (Macaca nemestrina), and to derive equations to predict the
volumetric bone density from noninvasive measurements, We measured the
areal bone density by DEXA, vertebral volume by underwater weighing,
mineral content by ashing, dimensions of lumbar vertebrae by calipers,
and dimensions of vertebrae by radiography, Somatometric measurements
of the female lumbar vertebral bodies showed that the shape changed d
uring growth, The bone mineral content from the densitometer correlate
d significantly with the ash weight (r = 0.99, error 8.7%), The correl
ation coefficient between the volumetric bone mineral density and area
l BMD measurement was significant (r = 0.68, p < 0.0001) with a 9.5% e
rror; this improved significantly to 0.82 (7.2% error) when the BMD wa
s divided by the vertebral depth from the radiograph. Areal BMD showed
a strong correlation with age (r = 0.82, p < 0.0001), with an average
increase of 7.4%/year. In contrast, volumetric mineral density showed
a weak relationship with age (r = 0.43, p < 0.01), for an average inc
rease of 1.5%/year, When studying bone mineral density during growth,
the differences between volumetric and areal bone mineral density shou
ld be taken into consideration. (C) 1997 by Elsevier Science Inc.