Ht. Le et al., DESIGN OF POTENT DYNORPHIN A-(1-9) ANALOGS DEVOID OF SUPRASPINAL MOTOR EFFECTS IN MICE, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology, 75(1), 1997, pp. 9-14
Four analogues of dynorphin (Dyn) A-(1-9) incorporating D-Leu in posit
ion 8 alone or in combination with the nonhydrolysable psi[CS-NH] thio
peptide bond surrogate between positions 6 and 7 were tested in vitro
for their ability to compete with the binding of selective kappa, mu,
and delta opioid ligands, using membrane preparations of guinea pig ce
rebellum (kappa) and rat brain (mu and delta), for their ability to bl
ock the electrically induced contractions of the guinea pig ileum, and
for their in vivo antinociceptive (writhing test) and motor (motor dy
sfunction assay) activities in mice. [D-Leu(8)]Dyn A-(1-9) displayed a
n affinity and a selectivity for the kappa opioid receptor that were c
omparable with those of Dyn A-(1-9). The potencies of [D-Leu(8)]Dyn A-
(1-9) in the guinea pig ileum, writhing, and motor dysfunction assays
were markedly enhanced (8-12 fold) compared with those of Dyn A-(1-9).
[(6) psi(7)(CS-NH),D-Leu(8)]Dyn A-(1-9), [Lys(6),(6) psi(7)(CS-NH),D-
Leu(8)]Dyn A-(1-9), and [Leu(6),(6) psi(7)(CS-NH),D-Leu(8)]Dyn A-(1-9)
were somewhat less potent than [D-Leu(8)]Dyn A-(1-9) in all opioid as
says. However, the thiopeptides were more potent analgesics than Dyn A
-(1-9) (ED50 of 29.5, 23.9, and 15.5 nmol/mouse, respectively,compared
with 90.7 nmol/mouse for Dyr A-(1-9)) and caused little or no motor i
mpairment at analgesic doses.