M. Murakami et al., Comparison between chemoradiation protocol intended for organ preservationand conventional surgery for clinical T1-T2 esophageal carcinoma, INT J RAD O, 45(2), 1999, pp. 277-284
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS
Purpose: This retrospective study was designed to compare treatment results
of the chemoradiation protocol with conventional surgery for thoracic T1-T
2 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Methods and Materials: Sixty-six patients with esophageal carcinoma, clinic
ally diagnosed as T1 (tumor invading lamina propria or submucosa) or T2 (tu
mor invading muscularis propria) were treated for 12 consecutive years, fro
m July 1986 to January 1998. The conventional surgery group included 30 pat
ients who underwent esophagectomy with regional lymph node dissection. Twen
ty-one of them received postoperative radiotherapy. Thirty-six patients wer
e assigned to the chemoradiation protocol, consisting of neoadjuvant chemor
adiotherapy (44 Gy; CDDP: 60 mg/m(2), day 1, bolus; 5-FU: 400 mg/m(2), day
1-4, continuous), followed by either definitive radiotherapy with high-dose
-rate intraluminal brachytherapy (total 70 Gy) for responders or surgery fo
r nonresponders as in the conventional surgery group. Surgical candidates i
n both groups received intraoperative radiotherapy for abdominal lymphatics
since 1991.
Results: In the protocol group, 4 patients underwent radical surgery after
neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and the remaining 32 underwent definitive ch
emoradiotherapy. Local control rates at 1 and 3 years were 85% and 70% in t
he T1/protocol group versus 91% and 80% in the T1/surgery group, and 83% an
d 83% in the T2/protocol group versus 94% and 80% in the T2/surgery group,
respectively. There was no statistical significance. Overall 1- and 3-year
survival rates were 100% and 83% in the T1/protocol group versus 82% and 72
% in the T1/surgery group (p = 0.36), and 100% and 51% in the T2/protocol g
roup, versus 95% and 68% in the T2/surgery group (p = 0.61), respectively.
There was no treatment-related mortality in either group. The rates of esop
hageal conservation were 92% in the T1/protocol group and 58% in the T2/pro
tocol group.
Conclusion: The chemoradiation protocol can result in comparable survival w
ith conventional surgery for patients with T1-T2 esophageal carcinoma. A ra
ndomized trial between definitive chemoradiotherapy and surgery is required
. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Inc.