Jr. Perks et al., Optimization of stereotactically-guided conformal treatment planning of sellar and parasellar tumors, based on normal brain dose volume histograms, INT J RAD O, 45(2), 1999, pp. 507-513
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS
Purpose: To investigate the optimal treatment plan for stereotactically-gui
ded conformal radiotherapy (SCRT) of sellar and parasellar lesions, with re
spect to sparing normal brain tissue, in the context of routine treatment d
elivery, based on dose volume histogram analysis.
Methods and Materials: Computed tomography (CT) data sets for 8 patients wi
th sellar- and parasellar-based tumors (6 pituitary adenomas and 2 meningio
mas) have been used in this study. Treatment plans were prepared for 3-copl
anar and 3-, 4-, 6-, and 30-noncoplanar-field arrangements to obtain 95% is
odose coverage of the planning target volume (PTV) for each plan. Conformal
shaping was achieved by customized blocks generated with the beams eye vie
w (BEV) facility. Dose volume histograms (DVH) were calculated for the norm
al brain (excluding the PTV), and comparisons made for normal tissue sparin
g for all treatment plans at greater than or equal to 80%, greater than or
equal to 60%, and greater than or equal to 40% of the prescribed dose.
Results: The mean volume of normal brain receiving greater than or equal to
80% and greater than or equal to 60% of the prescribed dose decreased by 2
2.3% (range 14.8-35.1%, standard deviation sigma = 7.5%) and 47.6% (range 2
5.8-69.1%, sigma = 13.2%), respectively, with a 4-field noncoplanar techniq
ue when compared with a conventional 3-field coplanar technique. Adding 2 f
urther fields, from 4-noncoplanar to 6-noncoplanar fields reduced the mean
normal brain volume receiving greater than or equal to 80% of the prescribe
d dose by a further 4.1% (range -6.5-11.8%, sigma = 6.4%), and the volume r
eceiving greater than or equal to 60% by 3.3% (range -5.5-12.2%, sigma = 5.
4%), neither of which were statistically significant. Each case must be con
sidered individually however, as a wide range is seen in the volume spared
when increasing the number of fields from 4 to 6. Comparing the 4- and 6-fi
eld noncoplanar techniques to a 30-field conformal field approach (simulati
ng a dynamic are plan) revealed near-equivalent normal tissue sparing.
Conclusion: Four to six widely spaced, fixed-conformal fields provide the o
ptimum class solution for the treatment of sellar and parasellar lesions, b
oth in terms of normal brain tissue sparing and providing a relatively stra
ightforward patient setup. Increasing the number of fields did not result i
n further significant sparing, with no clear benefit from techniques approa
ching dynamic conformal radiotherapy in the cases examined. (C) 1999 Elsevi
er Science Inc.