The article tries to develop a better understanding of the role of discursi
ve formations in the establishment of a nationalist claim. Nationalist disc
ourses are defined as a distinctive subset of those discursive practices di
rected to transform, through the drawing of a boundary, a given audience in
a solidary community, characterized by an internal, socially constructed s
imilarity and by an external, socially constructed difference. It is argued
that such a cultural approach may also help clarify some controversial iss
ues in the sociology of nationalism, such as the meaning of the frequently
made distinctions between 'ethnic' and 'civic nationalism. It is argued tha
t, while useful in identifying two crucial rhetorical resources, such disti
nction is troublesome when applied to nationalist actors.
The empirical focus of the article is an analysis of a sample of articles p
ublished in the main Italian newspapers about the secessionist campaign of
the Northern League in 1996. An analysis of their contents makes it possibl
e to highlight the plurality of discursive strategies employed by social ac
tors in order to advocate or oppose a nationalist claim. It is shown how al
l the actors involved adopt rhetorical themes belonging both to 'ethnic' an
d 'civic' templates.