The impact of alanyl-glutamine on clinical safety, nitrogen balance, intestinal permeability, and clinical outcome in postoperative patients: A randomized, double-blind, controlled study of 120 patients
Zm. Jiang et al., The impact of alanyl-glutamine on clinical safety, nitrogen balance, intestinal permeability, and clinical outcome in postoperative patients: A randomized, double-blind, controlled study of 120 patients, J PARENT EN, 23(5), 1999, pp. S62-S66
Purpose: To evaluate the impact of alanyl-glutamine (Ala-Gln)-supplemented
parenteral nutrition (PN) on clinical safety, nitrogen balance, intestinal
permeability, and clinical outcome in postoperative patients. Methods: One
hundred twenty patients undergoing major abdominal surgery were enrolled. P
rotocol was approved and informed consent obtained. A double-blind protocol
was designed as used in Europe. The clinical safety and outcome were obser
ved for 60 patients in 2 centers (30 each). Sixty patients from 2 additiona
l centers (30 each) were observed for clinical safety, nitrogen balance, in
testinal permeability, and clinical outcome. All patients received isonitro
genous (0.20 g/kg body wt per day) and isocaloric (30 kcal/kg body wt per d
ay) parenteral nutrition. The study group received Ala-Gln (Dipeptiven, Fre
senius Kabi, Bad Homberg, Germany) 0.50 g/kg per day. Clinical chemistry va
riables, plasma amino acids profile, nitrogen balance, intestinal permeabil
ity (lactulose/mannitol ratio [L/M ratio]) were measured; hospital stay and
infection rate were monitored. Statview was used for analysis of variance
(ANOVA) or chi(2) tests. Data were expressed as means +/-SD, and the signif
icance level was p < .05. Results: The patients in both groups were compara
ble prior to the operation. Vital signs and clinical chemical parameters we
re similar between groups. L/M ratio was 0.047 +/- 0.029 in control and 0.0
58 +/- 0.049 in study group before the operation (AOD-3). The L/M ratio was
0.132 +/- 0.081 in the control group, and 0.097 +/-: 0.063 in study group
an the seventh postoperative day. The difference of L/M ratio between group
s was significant (p = .02). The cumulative nitrogen balance values were -5
+/- 162 mg/kg for 6 days in control and 144 +/- 145 mg/kg for 6 days in st
udy group (p =.0004). All the patients recovered without incision infection
. However, there were 3 cases that had infection-related complications in t
he control group; the difference was not significant between groups. The ho
spital stay in the study group was 12.5 days, which was 4 days less than th
at of the control group (p = .02). Conclusions: Ala-Gln-supplemented PN was
clinically safe, had better nitrogen balance, and maintained intestinal pe
rmeability in postoperative patients, The clinical outcome of the patients
in study group was better; it was significantly different from the control
group.