Critics of Aristotelian accounts of practical reasoning, in teaching and in
other contexts, criticise phronesis for its rigidity and lack of imaginati
on. This paper argues that phantasia, or imagination, helps us to develop a
richer account of Aristotle's phronesis. Two senses of phantasia, as produ
cing images and as an interpretive faculty, are proposed here to be importa
ntly involved in phronesis. By producing images that help in the selection
of an end goal, and by having an interpretive faculty that helps to compare
competing possibilities, phantasia plays a crucial role in the practical r
easoning process of phronesis.