In debates about ethnicity it is often taken for granted that Africans deve
loped or imagined an ethnic identity: albeit in different periods and in di
fferent forms. In the Kuando-Kubango province in southeastern Angola, howev
er, ethnic ideology does nor seem to have acquired the compelling attractio
n it has had elsewhere in Africa, Among refugees from this area, who now li
ve in Rundu (Namibia), ethnicity is avoided as a category of identity as we
ll. Very different explanations have been given for the uneven development
of ethnic consciousness, Thus some have implied that ethnicity meant little
for Africans living in areas rc here colonial control, missionary enterpri
se, and a migrant economy did not make a great impact. In another interpret
ation, specifically dealing with refugees, the lack of ethnic identity has
been explained as a 'pragmatics of identity` intended to counter the 'label
s' attached to refugees by local citizens. Refugees rise the lack of fixed
ethnic identity as a means of becoming inconspicuous members of a cosmopoli
tan culture and so avoid expulsion. In the first interpretation, the limite
d significance of ethnicity is situated in peripheral conditions; in the se
cond approach, the fear of ending up in such conditions informs a tactics d
esigned to deny ethnic identity. This article attempts to show that it is n
or only possible brit, in the case under discussion, necessary to reconcile
the 'thesis of marginality' with the 'thesis of strategy'.