Laboratory evaluation of AI3-37220, AI3-35765, CIC-4, and deet repellents against three species of mosquitoes

Citation
M. Debboun et al., Laboratory evaluation of AI3-37220, AI3-35765, CIC-4, and deet repellents against three species of mosquitoes, J AM MOSQ C, 15(3), 1999, pp. 342-347
Citations number
41
Categorie Soggetti
Entomology/Pest Control
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MOSQUITO CONTROL ASSOCIATION
ISSN journal
8756971X → ACNP
Volume
15
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
342 - 347
Database
ISI
SICI code
8756-971X(199909)15:3<342:LEOAAC>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
Four repellents, N,N-diethyl-3-methyl-benzamide (deet), 2-hydroxy-methyl-cy clohexyl acetic acid lactone (CIC-4), and 2 piperidines (1-[3-cyclohexen-1- ylcarbonyl] piperidine [AI3-35765] and 1-[3-cyclohexen-1-ylcarbonyl]-2-meth ylpiperidine [AI3-37220]) were evaluated alone and in combination against A edes aegypti, Anopheles stephensi, and Culex quinquefasciatus using a modif ied in vitro test system. This method was a valuable tool for comparing eff ective concentrations of the new compounds. Because of the controlled condi tions of the test, it was possible to use the results of assays that had be en conducted over a 5-year period and to perform the many replications nece ssary to evaluate combinations of compounds. The new candidate repellents w ere generally as effective as deet. Although speculative at this time, ther e was some evidence of synergistic interaction. Repellent combinations of C IC-4/AI3-37220/AI3-35767, deet/AI3-35765, and deet/AI3-37220/AI3-35765 agai nst An. stephensi and CIC-4/AI3-35765, deet/AI3-37220/AI3-35765, AI3-37220/ AI3-35765, and CIC-4/AI3-37220 against Ae. aegypti were more effective than the component compounds alone.