The 16-City Study analyzed for gas-phase environmental tobacco smoke (ETS)
constituents (nicotine, 3-ethenyl pyridine [3-EP], and myosmine) and for pa
rticulate-phase constituents (respirable particulate matter [RSP], ultravio
let-absorbing particulate matter [UVPM], fluorescing particulate matter [FP
M], scopoletin, and solanesol). In this second of three articles, we discus
s the merits of each constituent as a marker for ETS and report pair-wise c
omparisons of the markers. Neither nicotine nor UVPM were good predictors f
or RSP. However, nicotine and UVPM were good qualitative predictors of each
other. Nicotine was correlated with other gas-phase constituents. Comparis
ons between UVPM and other particulate-phase constituents were performed. I
ts relation with FPM was excellent, with UVPM approximately 11/2 times FPM.
The correlation between UVPM and solanesol was good, but the relationship
between the two was not linear. The relation between UVPM and scopoletin wa
s not good, largely because of noise in the scopoletin measures around its
limit of detection. We considered the relation between nicotine and saliva
cotinine, a metabolite of nicotine. The two were highly correlated on the g
roup level. That is, for each cell (smoking home and work, smoking home but
nonsmoking work, and so forth), there was high correlation between average
cotinine and 24-hour time-weighted average (TWA) nicotine concentrations.
However, on the individual level, the correlations, although significant, w
ere not biologically meaningful. A consideration of cotinine and nicotine o
r 3-EP on a subset of the study whose only exposure to ETS was exclusively
at work or exclusively at home showed that home exposure was a more importa
nt source of ETS than work exposure.