Use of environmental tobacco smoke constituents as markers for exposure

Citation
Js. Lakind et al., Use of environmental tobacco smoke constituents as markers for exposure, RISK ANAL, 19(3), 1999, pp. 359-373
Citations number
53
Categorie Soggetti
Sociology & Antropology
Journal title
RISK ANALYSIS
ISSN journal
02724332 → ACNP
Volume
19
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
359 - 373
Database
ISI
SICI code
0272-4332(199906)19:3<359:UOETSC>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
The 16-City Study analyzed for gas-phase environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) constituents (nicotine, 3-ethenyl pyridine [3-EP], and myosmine) and for pa rticulate-phase constituents (respirable particulate matter [RSP], ultravio let-absorbing particulate matter [UVPM], fluorescing particulate matter [FP M], scopoletin, and solanesol). In this second of three articles, we discus s the merits of each constituent as a marker for ETS and report pair-wise c omparisons of the markers. Neither nicotine nor UVPM were good predictors f or RSP. However, nicotine and UVPM were good qualitative predictors of each other. Nicotine was correlated with other gas-phase constituents. Comparis ons between UVPM and other particulate-phase constituents were performed. I ts relation with FPM was excellent, with UVPM approximately 11/2 times FPM. The correlation between UVPM and solanesol was good, but the relationship between the two was not linear. The relation between UVPM and scopoletin wa s not good, largely because of noise in the scopoletin measures around its limit of detection. We considered the relation between nicotine and saliva cotinine, a metabolite of nicotine. The two were highly correlated on the g roup level. That is, for each cell (smoking home and work, smoking home but nonsmoking work, and so forth), there was high correlation between average cotinine and 24-hour time-weighted average (TWA) nicotine concentrations. However, on the individual level, the correlations, although significant, w ere not biologically meaningful. A consideration of cotinine and nicotine o r 3-EP on a subset of the study whose only exposure to ETS was exclusively at work or exclusively at home showed that home exposure was a more importa nt source of ETS than work exposure.