Preventing stress fractures requires knowledge of the risk factors that pre
dispose to this injury. The aetiology of stress fractures is multifactorial
, but methodological limitations and expediency often lead to research stud
y designs that evaluate individual risk factors. intrinsic risk factors inc
lude mechanical factors such as bone density, skeletal alignment and body s
ize and composition, physiological factors such as bone turnover rate, flex
ibility, and muscular strength and endurance, as well as hormonal and nutri
tional factors. Extrinsic risk factors include mechanical factors such as s
urface, footwear and external loading as well as physical training paramete
rs. Psychological traits may also play a role in increasing stress fracture
risk. Equally important to these types of analyses of individual risk fact
ors is the integration of information to produce a composite picture of ris
k.
The purpose of this paper is to critically appraise the existing literature
by evaluating study design and quality, in order to provide a current syno
psis of the known scientific information related to stress fracture risk fa
ctors. The literature is not fully complete with well conducted studies on
this topic, but a great deal of information has accumulated over the past 2
0 years. Although stress fractures result from repeated loading, the exact
contribution of training factors (volume, intensity, surface) has not been
clearly established, From what we do know, menstrual disturbances, caloric
restriction, lower bone density, muscle weakness and leg length differences
are risk factors for stress fracture. Other time-honoured risk factors suc
h as lower extremity alignment have not been shown to be causative even tho
ugh anecdotal evidence indicates they are likely to play an important role
in stress fracture pathogenesis.