COMPARISON OF ELTANOLONE AND PROPOFOL IN ANESTHESIA FOR TERMINATION OF PREGNANCY

Citation
H. Kallela et al., COMPARISON OF ELTANOLONE AND PROPOFOL IN ANESTHESIA FOR TERMINATION OF PREGNANCY, Anesthesia and analgesia, 79(3), 1994, pp. 512-516
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Anesthesiology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00032999
Volume
79
Issue
3
Year of publication
1994
Pages
512 - 516
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-2999(1994)79:3<512:COEAPI>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
A randomized study was designed to compare eltanolone (pregnanolone) a nd propofol anesthesia in 60 unpremedicated women undergoing outpatien t termination of pregnancy. The initial doses for induction of anesthe sia were 0.8 mg/kg for eltanolone and 2 mg/kg for propofol followed by an additional 25% increment if necessary. The doses required for succ essful induction were 0.82 +/- 0.06 and 2.1 +/- 0.3 (mean +/- SD) mg/k g for eltanolone and propofol, respectively. Discomfort or pain on inj ection occurred in none of the patients given eltanolone and in 20% of those receiving propofol (P < 0.05). To maintain satisfactory anesthe sia, 29% of the patients given eltanolone and 70% of the patients give n propofol needed extra bolus doses of the study drug (P < 0.01). Exci tation (twitching of extremities or slight hypertonus) occurred in 29% of the patients in the eltanolone group compared to none in the propo fol group (P < 0.05). Both clinical (opening eyes, orientation, walkin g, tolerating oral fluids, voiding) and psychomotor recovery (Maddox W ing test and Digit Symbol Substitution test) returned to baseline more slowly after eltanolone than after propofol. Overall home readiness w as achieved later in the eltanolone group [median 57 min (range 41-190 min)] compared to the propofol [37 (32-100 min)] group. We conclude t hat recovery from anesthesia is more rapid from propofol as compared t o eltanolone anesthesia.