H. Kallela et al., COMPARISON OF ELTANOLONE AND PROPOFOL IN ANESTHESIA FOR TERMINATION OF PREGNANCY, Anesthesia and analgesia, 79(3), 1994, pp. 512-516
A randomized study was designed to compare eltanolone (pregnanolone) a
nd propofol anesthesia in 60 unpremedicated women undergoing outpatien
t termination of pregnancy. The initial doses for induction of anesthe
sia were 0.8 mg/kg for eltanolone and 2 mg/kg for propofol followed by
an additional 25% increment if necessary. The doses required for succ
essful induction were 0.82 +/- 0.06 and 2.1 +/- 0.3 (mean +/- SD) mg/k
g for eltanolone and propofol, respectively. Discomfort or pain on inj
ection occurred in none of the patients given eltanolone and in 20% of
those receiving propofol (P < 0.05). To maintain satisfactory anesthe
sia, 29% of the patients given eltanolone and 70% of the patients give
n propofol needed extra bolus doses of the study drug (P < 0.01). Exci
tation (twitching of extremities or slight hypertonus) occurred in 29%
of the patients in the eltanolone group compared to none in the propo
fol group (P < 0.05). Both clinical (opening eyes, orientation, walkin
g, tolerating oral fluids, voiding) and psychomotor recovery (Maddox W
ing test and Digit Symbol Substitution test) returned to baseline more
slowly after eltanolone than after propofol. Overall home readiness w
as achieved later in the eltanolone group [median 57 min (range 41-190
min)] compared to the propofol [37 (32-100 min)] group. We conclude t
hat recovery from anesthesia is more rapid from propofol as compared t
o eltanolone anesthesia.