Current clinical practice in hypertension: The EISBERG (Evaluation and interventions for systolic blood pressure elevation - Regional and global) project
Jd. Swales, Current clinical practice in hypertension: The EISBERG (Evaluation and interventions for systolic blood pressure elevation - Regional and global) project, AM HEART J, 138(3), 1999, pp. S231-S237
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Hypertension is one of the major treatable factors contributing to the burd
en of disease worldwide. However, despite national programs to encourage de
tection and treatment, there are still shortcomings in hypertension managem
ent. A large proportion of these can be attributed to socioeconomic factors
, professional shortcomings, and patient noncompliance with management regi
mens. The Evaluation and interventions for Systolic Blood pressure Elevatio
n-Regional and Global (EISBERG) project was conceived to examine the reason
s for suboptimal management of hypertension in more detail. Emphasis was pl
aced on control of elevated systolic blood pressure because this is often n
eglected despite evidence that it is more important than diastolic pressure
in predicting cardiovascular risk. The goals of the project include analys
is of the relative importance of systolic and diastolic blood pressure as c
ardiovascular risk factors, identification of any necessary changes in prac
tice, and the development and implementation of programs to promote appropr
iate changes in practice or attitudes. The three components of the initiati
ve are a formal collection of epidemiologic evidence to examine the relatio
n between systolic blood pressure and outcome; a cross-sectional, quantitat
ive database (CardioMonitor) providing information on the treatment of pati
ents with cardiovascular diseases including hypertension in seven countries
, and qualitative research into hypertension management to assess attitudes
, awareness, and knowledge among primary care physicians, patients and thei
r carers. The study showed more effort was directed toward control of diast
olic than systolic blood pressure. Adequate control of systolic blood press
ure was seldom achieved. Blood pressure targets tended to be raised in elde
rly patients in conflict with recommendations and evidence that there is gr
eater benefit in treating hypertension more aggressively in this population
. Despite awareness of guidelines for treating hypertension, doctors were u
nsuccessful in practice.