An in vitro study was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of bracket placeme
nt for direct and indirect bonding techniques. Nineteen sets of duplicated
Class II malocclusion models were divided into three groups: (1) one set fo
r ideal bracket placement, (2) nine sets for direct bonding on mannequins,
and (3) nine sets for indirect bonding. Both direct and indirect bonding we
re performed on all teeth except molars by nine faculty members from the De
partment of Orthodontics, University of Pennsylvania. The position of each
bonded bracket from these two bonding groups was compared with that of the
same tooth from the ideal group and to each other in terms of bracket heigh
t, mesiodistal position, and angulation. Our results indicated that both di
rect and indirect bonding techniques failed to execute ideal bracket placem
ent. On individual teeth, there was no statistically significant difference
in the accuracy of bracket placement between these two bonding techniques
except for upper right second premolar and lower left central incisor, wher
e indirect bonding yielded better results in bracket height (P < .05), and
for lower left central incisor where indirect bonding was better in mesiodi
stal position (P < .05), and for upper right lateral incisor where direct b
onding was closer to the ideal in angulation (P < .05). Overall, indirect b
onding showed better bracket placement in bracket height (P < .05), whereas
, no statistically significant difference was found between them regarding
the angulation and mesiodistal position.