Objective: The senior authors developed a computer-assisted rapid, simultan
eous comparison system for nine international grading scales for facial par
alysis. The purpose of this study is to present the system and to compare t
he agreement of hand-performed House-Brackmann and Sunnybrook scales, two f
requently used scales herein taken as the concurrent criterion test standar
ds, with those like scales done simultaneously in the computed system.
Study Design: The study design was a prospective concurrent criterion valid
ity study. Test-retest reliability and interobserver agreement were assesse
d using the kappa statistic (k) for ordinal data and the intraclass correla
tion coefficient (ICC) for semidimensional data.
Setting: The study was conducted at a university practice.
Patients: Ten consecutive consenting subjects with varying degrees of facia
l paralysis were studied.
Intervention: Each subject was measured, in random order, twice by each met
hod by each of two independent observers.
Main Outcome Measures: House-Brackmann score, Sunnybrook score, and like-sc
ale scores done simultaneously in the computed system were measured.
Results: Agreement between the computed system and hand-performed criterion
standards was equal to each scale compared against itself; for the House-B
rackmann, agreement was moderate (k = 0.554); for the Sunnybrook, agreement
was excellent (ICC = 0.976).
Conclusions: The computed system has the advantage of allowing an examiner
to view a rapid, simultaneous display of multiple grading scale scores at a
keystroke from one clinical assessment input, obviating the labor of repea
ting measures by hand.