Rapid, simultaneous comparison system for subjective grading scales for facial paralysis

Citation
A. Ahrens et al., Rapid, simultaneous comparison system for subjective grading scales for facial paralysis, AM J OTOL, 20(5), 1999, pp. 667-671
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Otolaryngology
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLOGY
ISSN journal
01929763 → ACNP
Volume
20
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
667 - 671
Database
ISI
SICI code
0192-9763(199909)20:5<667:RSCSFS>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
Objective: The senior authors developed a computer-assisted rapid, simultan eous comparison system for nine international grading scales for facial par alysis. The purpose of this study is to present the system and to compare t he agreement of hand-performed House-Brackmann and Sunnybrook scales, two f requently used scales herein taken as the concurrent criterion test standar ds, with those like scales done simultaneously in the computed system. Study Design: The study design was a prospective concurrent criterion valid ity study. Test-retest reliability and interobserver agreement were assesse d using the kappa statistic (k) for ordinal data and the intraclass correla tion coefficient (ICC) for semidimensional data. Setting: The study was conducted at a university practice. Patients: Ten consecutive consenting subjects with varying degrees of facia l paralysis were studied. Intervention: Each subject was measured, in random order, twice by each met hod by each of two independent observers. Main Outcome Measures: House-Brackmann score, Sunnybrook score, and like-sc ale scores done simultaneously in the computed system were measured. Results: Agreement between the computed system and hand-performed criterion standards was equal to each scale compared against itself; for the House-B rackmann, agreement was moderate (k = 0.554); for the Sunnybrook, agreement was excellent (ICC = 0.976). Conclusions: The computed system has the advantage of allowing an examiner to view a rapid, simultaneous display of multiple grading scale scores at a keystroke from one clinical assessment input, obviating the labor of repea ting measures by hand.