H. Qian et Re. Ricklefs, A comparison of the taxonomic richness of vascular plants in China and theUnited States, AM NATURAL, 154(2), 1999, pp. 160-181
Numbers of taxa at the level of order, family, genus, and species were tabu
lated for 12 subclass-level taxonomic groups of vascular plants in the flor
as of China and the United States. Analysis of these data showed that the f
lora of China is significantly more diverse than that of the United States.
Furthermore, the difference in diversity arises at and below the level of
genera. Finally. the euasterids II and Caryophyllidae are exceptions to the
general trend in being more diverse in the United States. As a result, the
floras of China and the United States are different nonrandom samples of t
he floras of the North Temperate Zone and the world. Phylogenetically older
groups have a larger proportion of genera shared between China and the Uni
ted States and also lend to have larger proportions of taxa belonging to ge
nera with tropical affinities. The two subclass-level groups that are more
diverse in the United States have primarily temperate affinities and are re
latively young phylogenetically. We conclude that the patterns of diversity
of Chinese and U.S. vascular plants have been influenced by the longer and
more open access of temperate eastern Asia to tropical regions, the presen
ce in southern China of a larger area of subtropical climate with complex t
opography, and the reduced impact of late Tertiary climate cooling in easte
rn Asia compared to North America. The greatest differences in diversity oc
cur among older groups having stronger tropical affinities and, perhaps, or
iginating in eastern Asia. In the North American flora, these groups appear
to be disproportionately small relicts of a formerly widespread "boreotrop
ical flora" that was relatively homogeneous at the genus level across the B
ering Land Bridge between eastern Asia and North America. Groups that arose
and diversified later, and that have fewer genera in common between Asian
and North American floras, particularly the euasterids II, were better adap
ted to the cooler and drier climates of the Neogene temperate latitudes and
evidently were relatively unaffected by late Neogene glaciations. These gr
oups are thus as diverse, or more diverse, in North America as in eastern A
sia. Understanding the relative-diversity of two regions requires an apprec
iation of the historical development of the floras in the context of large-
scale processes and events.