Dynamic contrast enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the breast is superior to triple assessment for the pre-operative detection of multifocal breast cancer
Pj. Drew et al., Dynamic contrast enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the breast is superior to triple assessment for the pre-operative detection of multifocal breast cancer, ANN SURG O, 6(6), 1999, pp. 599-603
Background: Inadequately treated multifocal and multicentric disease result
s in increased local recurrence following breast-conserving surgery. The ac
curate preoperative diagnosis of multifocal/ centric breast cancer would fa
cilitate the planning of appropriate surgery and prevent reoperation for re
sidual disease. While triple assessment remains the established diagnostic
technique, its sensitivity for the diagnosis of multifocal disease remains
poor. Dynamic contrast enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DCE-MRI) of the
breast represents an alternative emerging diagnostic modality that has bee
n shown to be highly sensitive for the delineation of primary breast cancer
. The aim of this; study was to prospectively compare the diagnostic accura
cy of DCE-MRI of the breast with conventional triple assessment for the pre
operative diagnosis of multifocal/centric breast cancer.
Methods: Patients were recruited from the symptomatic breast clinics. All p
atients underwent standard triple assessment and DCE-MRI. The MRI scans wer
e reported by a single radiologist blinded to the results of the triple ass
essment, Surgery was then planned accordingly to all available scan results
and the specimens examined by a single pathologist. All patients who did n
ot undergo surgery have been followed up for a minimum of 18 months.
Results: A total of 334 women were recruited. There were 178 (52%) cancers
that were histologically confirmed and multifocal/centric breast cancer was
diagnosed provisionally by the preoperative investigations in 68 (38%); mu
ltifocal n = 33, multicentric n = 35, of these patients. In this group, sub
sequent histology confirmed multifocal/centric disease in 50 (73.5%): multi
focal n = 15, multicentric n = 35. Unifocal cancer was found in 15 (22%) an
d benign disease in 3 (4.4%). The resultant sensitivity, specificity, posit
ive, and negative predictive values were 18%, 100%, 100%, and 76% for tripl
e assessment and 100%, 86%, 73%, and 100% for DCE-MRI.
Conclusion: DCE-MRI identified a subgroup of breast cancer patients with mu
ltifocal/centric disease not evident on standard triple assessment. MRI of
the breast should be considered for the preoperative planning of surgery fo
r primary breast cancer.