Gemifloxacin mesylate (SB 265805), a new fluoronaphthyridone, was tested ag
ainst 359 recent clinical anaerobic isolates by the National Committee for
Clinical Laboratory Standards reference agar dilution method with supplemen
ted brucella blood agar and an inoculum of 10(5) CFU/spot. Comparative anti
mitrobials tested included trovafloxacin, levofloxacin, grepafloxacin, spar
floxacin, sitafloxacin (DU-6859a), penicillin G, amoxicillin clavulanate, i
mipenem, cefoxitin, clindamycin, and metronidazole. The MIG(50) and MIC90 (
MICs at which 50 and 90% of the isolates were inhibited) of gemifloxacin ag
ainst various organisms with the number of strains tested in parentheses we
re as follows tin micrograms per milliliter: for Bacteroides fragilis (28),
0.5 and 2; for Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron (24), 1 and 16; for Bacteroide
s caccae (12), 1 and 16; for Bacteroides distasonis (12), 8 and >16; for Ba
cteroides ovatus (12), 4 and >16; for Bacteroides stercoris (12), 0.5 and 0
.5; for Bacteroides uniformis (12), 1 and 4; for Bacteroides vulgatus (11),
4 and I; for Clostridium clostridioforme (15), 0.5 and 0.5; for Clostridiu
m difficile (15), 1 and >16; for Clostridium innocuum (13), 0.125 and 2; fo
r Clostridium perfringens (13), 0.06 and 0.06; for Clostridium ramosum (14)
, 0.25 and 8; for Fusobacterium nucleatum (12), 0.125 and 0.25; for Fusobac
terium necrophorum (11), 0.25 and 0.5; for Fusobacterium varium (13), 0.5 a
nd 1; for Fusobacterium spp. (12), 1 and 2; for Peptostreptococcus anaerobi
us (13), 0.06 and 0.06; for Peptostreptococcus asaccharolyticus (13), 0.125
and 0.1253 for Peptostreptococcus magnus (14), 0.03 and 0.03; for Peptostr
eptococcus micros (12), 0.06 and 0.06; for Peptostreptococcus prevotii (14)
, 0.06 and 0.25; for Porphyromonas asaccharolytica (11), 0.125 and 0.125; f
or Prevotella bi,lia (10), 8 and 16; for Prevotella buccae (10), 2 and 2; f
or Prevotella intermedia (10), 0.5 and 0.5; and for Prevotella melaninogeni
ca (11), 1 and 1. Gemifloxacin mesylate (SB 265805) was 1 to 4 dilutions mo
re active than trovafloxacin against fusobacteria and peptostreptococci, an
d the two drugs were equivalent against clostridia and P. asaccharolytica.
Gemifloxacin was equivalent to sitafloxacin (DU 6859a) against peptostrepto
cocci, C. perfringens, and C. ramosum, and sitafloxacin was 2 to 3 dilution
s more active against fusobacteria. Sparfloxacin, grepafloxacin, and levofl
oxacin were generally less active than gemifloxacin against all anaerobes.