M. Rodehutscord et M. Pack, Estimates of essential amino acid requirements from dose-response studies with rainbow trout and broiler chicken: Effect of mathematical model, ARCH ANIM N, 52(3), 1999, pp. 223-244
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Animal Sciences
Journal title
ARCHIVES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION-ARCHIV FUR TIERERNAHRUNG
A total of 37 dose-response experiments with essential amino acids performe
d with rainbow trout and broiler chicken were re-evaluated with different m
athematical approaches: an exponential model, a four-parameter logistic fun
ction, the saturation kinetics model and the broken line approach. The diff
erent approaches were compared both with regard to the goodness of fit (r(2
) and s(y, x)) and with regard to the allowances which were derived regardi
ng the optimal amino acid level in the diet. The experimental design, parti
cularly the chosen range in dietary amino acid concentration was found to b
e important for the comparison of models. Amongst the non-linear models, th
e four-parameter logistic function and the saturation kinetics model appear
ed superior to the exponential approach, when the range in dietary amino ac
id concentration was very wide and included both a severely deficient basal
level and a level that exceeded the needs of the animal by approximately t
he factor 2. In these cases, allowances derived from individual experiments
were considerably different depending on the model. The allowances based o
n the exponential and the saturation kinetics approach were 27.7 and 20.7 g
lysine/kg DM and 8.0 and 6.3 g methionine/kg DM, respectively, for rainbow
trout. For other amino acids studied in rainbow trout the difference due t
o model was less. Consequently, the predicted 'ideal protein' for rainbow t
rout was considerably different depending on the model used. The maximum de
viation found in different experiments with broiler chicken for the exponen
tial vs. the saturation kinetics approach was 13.0 and 9.7 g lysine/kg and
11.4 and 8.2 g sulfur-containing amino acids/kg, respectively. However, the
more restricted the range in dietary concentration was, the lesser became
the differences between the different non-linear models. No definite recomm
endation can therefore be extracted regarding the most suitable, generally
applicable mathematical model.