Randomized double-blind study comparing the efficacy of gabapentin with amitriptyline on diabetic peripheral neuropathy pain

Citation
Cm. Morello et al., Randomized double-blind study comparing the efficacy of gabapentin with amitriptyline on diabetic peripheral neuropathy pain, ARCH IN MED, 159(16), 1999, pp. 1931-1937
Citations number
41
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
ISSN journal
00039926 → ACNP
Volume
159
Issue
16
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1931 - 1937
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-9926(19990913)159:16<1931:RDSCTE>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Background: Reports of gabapentin use in diabetic peripheral neuropathy pai n stimulate a need for controlled trials to determine its comparative effic acy to the therapeutic standard of amitriptyline hydrochloride. Objective: To determine the efficacy of gabapentin compared with amitriptyl ine in treating diabetic peripheral neuropathy pain. Design: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover stud y. Setting: Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, Ambulatory Care Clin ic. Patients: Twenty-eight veterans were referred by their primary care provide rs. Two patients withdrew before randomization because of no neuropathic pa in after washout; a third withdrew for unexpected surgery that required ana lgesics. Three patients withdrew because of adverse effects and 1 for proto col violation. Interventions: Patients with stable glycemic control and neuropathic gain r andomized to 6 weeks of therapy with gabapentin, 900 to 1800 mg/d, or amitr iptyline hydrochloride; 25 to 75 mg/d, with a 1-week washout before crossov er. Main Outcome Measures: Pain relief measured by pain scale with verbal descr iptors and global pain score assessment at treatment end. Results: Participants and investigators were blinded throughout. Mean dosag es were of gabapentin, 1565 mg/d, and of amitriptyline hydrochloride, 59 mg /d. Sixty-five percent of patients reached maximum dose with gabapentin and 54% with amitriptyline. Mean score diary analysis showed pain relief with gabapentin and amitriptyline was not significantly different (P =.26). Glob al data were obtained from 21 of 25; enrolled patients who completed the st udy. Moderate or greater pain relief was experienced in 11 (52%) of 21 pati ents with gabapentin and 14 (67%) of 21 patients with amitriptyline. There were no significant period or carry-over effects (P=.35). Conclusions: Although both drugs provide pain relief, mean pain score and g lobal pain score data indicate no significant difference between gabapentin and amitriptyline. Gabapentin may be an alternative for treating diabetic peripheral neuropathy pain, yet does not appear to offer considerable advan tage over amitriptyline and is more expensive. Larger trials are necessary to define gabapentin's place in treating diabetic peripheral neuropathy pai n.