Cm. Morello et al., Randomized double-blind study comparing the efficacy of gabapentin with amitriptyline on diabetic peripheral neuropathy pain, ARCH IN MED, 159(16), 1999, pp. 1931-1937
Citations number
41
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Background: Reports of gabapentin use in diabetic peripheral neuropathy pai
n stimulate a need for controlled trials to determine its comparative effic
acy to the therapeutic standard of amitriptyline hydrochloride.
Objective: To determine the efficacy of gabapentin compared with amitriptyl
ine in treating diabetic peripheral neuropathy pain.
Design: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover stud
y.
Setting: Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, Ambulatory Care Clin
ic.
Patients: Twenty-eight veterans were referred by their primary care provide
rs. Two patients withdrew before randomization because of no neuropathic pa
in after washout; a third withdrew for unexpected surgery that required ana
lgesics. Three patients withdrew because of adverse effects and 1 for proto
col violation.
Interventions: Patients with stable glycemic control and neuropathic gain r
andomized to 6 weeks of therapy with gabapentin, 900 to 1800 mg/d, or amitr
iptyline hydrochloride; 25 to 75 mg/d, with a 1-week washout before crossov
er.
Main Outcome Measures: Pain relief measured by pain scale with verbal descr
iptors and global pain score assessment at treatment end.
Results: Participants and investigators were blinded throughout. Mean dosag
es were of gabapentin, 1565 mg/d, and of amitriptyline hydrochloride, 59 mg
/d. Sixty-five percent of patients reached maximum dose with gabapentin and
54% with amitriptyline. Mean score diary analysis showed pain relief with
gabapentin and amitriptyline was not significantly different (P =.26). Glob
al data were obtained from 21 of 25; enrolled patients who completed the st
udy. Moderate or greater pain relief was experienced in 11 (52%) of 21 pati
ents with gabapentin and 14 (67%) of 21 patients with amitriptyline. There
were no significant period or carry-over effects (P=.35).
Conclusions: Although both drugs provide pain relief, mean pain score and g
lobal pain score data indicate no significant difference between gabapentin
and amitriptyline. Gabapentin may be an alternative for treating diabetic
peripheral neuropathy pain, yet does not appear to offer considerable advan
tage over amitriptyline and is more expensive. Larger trials are necessary
to define gabapentin's place in treating diabetic peripheral neuropathy pai
n.