Ja. Palta et Z. Plaut, Yield and components of seed yield of indeterminate narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.) subjected to transient water deficit, AUST J AGR, 50(7), 1999, pp. 1225-1232
The effect of transient water deficits on seed yield and components of seed
yield of narrow-leafed lupin was measured in plants grown in a controlled
environment under simulated field conditions. Lupins were grown in large co
lumns of soil and transient water deficits were induced at pod set on the m
ainstem and first-order apical branches by withholding water for a 5-day pe
riod. Soil water content, leaf water potential, turgor pressure, and leaf c
onductance declined similarly during each period of transient water deficit
. Differences in these parameters were apparent 2 days after water was with
held, and over the 5-day period, leaf water potential declined to -1.3 MPa
and leaf conductance fell to 44% of the well-watered controls. Total dry ma
tter per plant was reduced by the transient water deficit treatments. The r
eduction resulted from less accumulation of dry matter on the first, second
, and third order apical branches. Leaf area on these branches was also red
uced by abscission of the leaves after the water deficit was released. Seed
yield per plant after each period of transient water deficit was reduced b
y 30-33%, relative to the well-watered controls. The reduction was largely
due to a reduction in seed yield on the branches, mainly because they had f
ewer pods and seeds per pod. Seed dry weight and harvest index were not sig
nificantly affected by each period of transient water deficit. We conclude
that differences in final seed yield between the well-watered controls and
the transient water deficit treatments resulted from differences in pod num
ber and seeds per pod. Low dry matter accumulation and reduction in leaf ar
ea on the first- and second-order apical branches under the transient water
deficit were associated with the differences. Whereas the differences in p
od number generated differences in the size of the reproductive sink, the d
ifferences in leaf area generated differences in the source capacity for as
similates for pod set and pod-filling.