Added value of bone mineral density in hip fracture risk scores

Citation
H. Burger et al., Added value of bone mineral density in hip fracture risk scores, BONE, 25(3), 1999, pp. 369-374
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology, Metabolism & Nutrition","da verificare
Journal title
BONE
ISSN journal
87563282 → ACNP
Volume
25
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
369 - 374
Database
ISI
SICI code
8756-3282(199909)25:3<369:AVOBMD>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
Hip fractures constitute a major health problem. For effective prevention, high-risk groups need to be identified. The objective here was to develop h ip fracture risk scores while assessing the added value of bone mineral den sity relative to more conventional risk indicators. We prospectively follow ed during 4 years a cohort of 5208 persons (2193 men) aged 55 years and ove r from the Rotterdam Study, a population-based cohort study conducted in th e Netherlands. Risk scores for hip fracture were constructed using several conventional risk indicators requiring interview and anthropometry only, an d bone mineral density. During follow-up, 50 persons (14 men) suffered hip fracture. Hip fracture risk was independently determined by age, gender, he ight, the use of a walking aid, cigarette smoking, and either bone mineral density or weight, We developed two risk scores, with and without bone mine ral density. The observed ii-year risk ranged from 3/3389 (0.1%) to 17/169 (10.1%) for the lowest and highest category of the score including bone min eral density, respectively. For the score without bone mineral density, the se risks were 8/3117 (0.3%) and 16/144 (11.1%), respectively. The area unde r the receiver operating characteristic curve indicating discriminatory pow er was 0.88 for the risk score including, and 0.83 far the score excluding, bone mineral density (p for difference = 0.04). In conclusion, risk scores with and without bone mineral density measurement can be used for hip frac ture risk assessment in elderly persons. While the score with bone mineral density has a modestly better performance, the score requiring interview an d anthropometry only may be especially useful in primary care settings. (C) 1999 by Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.