The non-linear plasma pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel in patients has been w
ell established, however, the exact underlying mechanism remains to be eluc
idated. We have previously shown that the non-linear plasma pharmacokinetic
s of paclitaxel in mice results from Cremophor EL. To investigate whether C
remophor EL also plays a role in the non-linear pharmacokinetics of paclita
xel in patients, we have established its pharmacokinetics in patients recei
ving paclitaxel by 3-, 24- or 96-h intravenous infusion. The pharmacokineti
cs of Cremophor EL itself was non-linear as the clearance (Cl) in the 3-h s
chedules was significantly lower than when using the longer 24- or 96-h inf
usions (Cl175-3 h = 42.8 +/- 24.9 ml h(-1) m(-2); Cl175-24 h = 79.7 +/- 24.
3; P = 0.035 and Cl135-3 h = 44.1 +/- 21.8 ml h(-1) m(-1); Cl140-96 h = 211
.8 +/- 32.0; P < 0.001). Consequently the maximum plasma levels were much h
igher (0.62%) in the 3-h infusions than when using longer infusion duration
s. By using an in vitro equilibrium assay and determination in plasma ultra
filtrate we have established that the fraction of unbound paclitaxel in pla
sma is inversely related with the Cremophor EL level. Despite its relativel
y low molecular weight. no Cremophor EL was found in the ultrafiltrate frac
tion. Our results strongly suggest that entrapment of paclitaxel in plasma
by Cremophor EL, probably by inclusion in micelles, is the cause of the app
arent nonlinear plasma pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel. This mechanism of a
(pseudo-)non-linearity contrasts previous postulations about saturable dist
ribution and elimination kinetics and means that we must re-evaluate previo
us assumptions on pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics relationships. (C) 1999
Cancer Research Campaign.