Doctors as patients: postal survey examining consultants and general practitioners adherence to guidelines

Citation
M. Forsythe et al., Doctors as patients: postal survey examining consultants and general practitioners adherence to guidelines, BR MED J, 319(7210), 1999, pp. 605-608
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL
ISSN journal
09598138 → ACNP
Volume
319
Issue
7210
Year of publication
1999
Pages
605 - 608
Database
ISI
SICI code
0959-8138(19990904)319:7210<605:DAPPSE>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
Objectives To examine the adherence by senior NHS medical staff to the BMA guidelines on the ethical responsibilities of doctors towards themselves an d their families. Design Postal semistructured questionnaire. Setting Four randomly selected NHS trusts and three local medical committee s in South Thames region. Subjects Consultants and principals in general practice. Main outcome measures Personal use of health services. Results The response rate was 64% (724) for general practitioners and 72% ( 427) for consultants after three mailings. Most (1106, 96%) respondents wer e registered with a general practitioner, although little use was made of t heir services. 159 (26%) general practitioners were registered with a gener al practitioner in their own practice and 80 (11%) admitted to looking afte r members of their family. 73 (24%) consultants would never see their gener al practitioner before obtaining consultant advice. Most consultants and ge neral practitioners admitted to prescribing for themselves and their family . Responses to vignettes for different health problems indicated a general reluctance to take time off, but there were differences between consultants and general practitioners and by sex. Views on improvements needed include d the possibility of a "doctor's doctor," access to out of area secondary c are, an occupational health service for general practitioners, and regular health check ups. Conclusion The guidelines are largely not being followed, perhaps because o f the difficulties of obtaining access to general practitioners outside wor king hours. The occupational health service should be expanded and a genera l practitioner service for NHS staff piloted.