Trends in molecular geometries and bond strengths of the homoleptic d(10) metal carbonyl cations [M(CO)(n)](x+) (Mx+ = Cu+, Ag+, Au+, Zn2+, Cd2+, Hg2+; n=1-6): A theoretical study
Aj. Lupinetti et al., Trends in molecular geometries and bond strengths of the homoleptic d(10) metal carbonyl cations [M(CO)(n)](x+) (Mx+ = Cu+, Ag+, Au+, Zn2+, Cd2+, Hg2+; n=1-6): A theoretical study, CHEM-EUR J, 5(9), 1999, pp. 2573-2583
Quantum chemical investigations at the MP2 and CCSD(T) level with relativis
tic effective core potentials for the metals are reported for homoleptic ca
rbonyl complexes of the Group 11 and Group 12 d(10) metal cations with up t
o six carbonyl ligands. Additional calculations for some compounds were car
ried out using density functional theory (DFT) methods (BP86 and B3LYP). Th
ere is good agreement between theoretical CCSD(T) and experimental bond dis
sociation energies (BDEs), which are known for eight of the 36 complexes st
udied. The bond energies predicted by DFT are too high, The complexes [Cu(C
O)(n)](+) and [Au(CO)(n)](+) are predicted to be bound species for n = 1-5
only, whereas [Ag(CO)(n)](+) and the Group 12 carbonyls [M(CO)(n)](2+) are
bound species for n = 1-6, The metal-CO bonding has been analyzed with the
help of the natural bond orbital (NBO) method and the charge decomposition
analysis (CDA) partitioning scheme. The Group 11 species exhibit more coval
ent metal-CO bonds than those of Group 12, but coulombic interactions are d
ominant even for the Group 11 species. The dicarbonyls of Cu+, Ag+, and Au have shorter M-CO bonds than the monocarbonyls, and the bond dissociation
energies are higher for [M(CO)(2)](+) than for [M(CO)](+). This is explaine
d by the polarization (s-d(sigma) hybridization) of the metal valence elect
rons in [M(CO)](+). The metal-CO bond energies of the tricarbonyls are sign
ificantly lower than those of the dicarbonyls, because the favorable charge
polarization at the metal is not effective. The drop in the bond energy is
particularly great for [Au(CO)(3)](+), because the Au+-CO bonds in [Au(CO)
](+) and [Au(CO)(2)](+) are enhanced by covalent contributions. [Au(CO)](+)
and [Au(CO)(2)](+) have stronger metal-CO bonds than the copper and silver
analogues, but the tri- and tetracarbonyls of Au+ have weaker bonds than t
hose of Cu+ and Ag+. The M2+ - CO bond energies of the Group 12 carbonyls a
re significantly higher than those of the respective Group 11 carbonyls, Si
nce many of the complexes studied in this paper, particularly those of the
Group 12 dications, have not been synthesized yet, the results should prove
useful to experimentalists.