Study objectives: Exhaled nitric oxide (ENO) is a noninvasive marker of air
way ay inflammation:. The purpose of this study was to compare a standardiz
ed offline ENO measurement :apparatus with a validated on-line method,
Design: Asthmatic volunteers (n = 21) had ENO measured by the the two follo
wing methods: (1) inhalation to total lung capacity (TLC) followed by, exha
lation at a constant flow (45 mL/s) against a high resistance, while monito
ring nitric oxide (NO) and pressure on-line; and (2) inhalation to TLC and
exhalation into mylar balloons via an apparatus that included the same resi
stance and flow rate as used in the on-line method. We also examined NO sta
bility in mylar balloons over 48 h.
Measurements and results: ENO values (given as geometric mean in parts pel
billion [ppb]; 95% confidence intervals) differed between the on-line metho
d (69.6; 12.6 to 113.8) and the offline method(49.5; 30.9 to 79.3), indicat
ing that the offline method gave lower ENO measures than the on-line method
(p < 0.001), Furthermore, this: difference between measures increased with
: increasing mean values. The intraclass correlation coefficient (0.931), h
owever, showed excellent correlation between the on-line and offline method
s. Within-subject repeatability, as assessed 1,by the coefficient of repeat
ability (CR), was good for both the on-line and. offline methods (CK, 1.09
and 1.17, respectively). Geometric mean NO concentrations (95% confidence l
imits) in mylar balloons containing exhalate increased from a baseline of 5
5.8 ppb (30.9, 84.4) to 64.5 ppb (45.6, 91.1) and 69.5 ppb (51.4, 94.0) at
24 h and 48 h, respectively .
Conclusions: The offline method gave reproducible ENO values that were cons
istently smaller than, but showed good cor 1 elation with, values obtained
with:ith on-line ENO collection. This method is suitable for offline collec
tion, but the measured values are not interchangeable with those obtained b
y on-line measurement.